The Wild Card Format

Mandatory Credit: seattlesportsnet.com

Mandatory Credit: seattlesportsnet.com

I personally am not opposed to the concept of the wild card, or to any format that adds more teams to the playoffs in Major League Baseball. Even with the addition of a second wild card team, there are still far fewer teams in the playoffs than in some other sports. With a much longer season, twice as many games as in basketball and hockey, only ten teams make the playoffs, compared to sixteen, and two of them are eliminated before you have time to get that second beer from the fridge (well, at least me, since I pretty much can only drink one before I start to doze). What kind of reward is that for teams that have slogged through 162 games, with every player saying that they are aching in some way by the middle of August? In other sports, very mediocre teams, sometimes with less than a .500 record, make the post-season, while in baseball, you can easily with a winning percentage of, say, .560, 91 wins, and not play October baseball.

So, let’s start with the premise that the Wild Card is a good idea, with two teams being twice as good as one. It keeps fans more engaged, with more teams to actively, passionately root for because of the possibility of making the post-season. Look how many teams have been in contention, particularly in the American League, through the middle of September, with teams getting hot and getting cold, but leaving fans burning for that extra spot. That keeps ownership more engaged as there will obviously be lots more people in the seats. It keeps management more engaged, as more teams have the chance for that elusive extra spot. I kept reading how it caused a disruption in the typical deadline trading frenzy; some teams couldn’t decide whether to sell or buy. I can pretty much assume that it keeps players more engaged and focused; they have a lot more at stake than I do when I play co-ed softball on Sunday. Not that I think that any player should need any incentive other than personal pride to play hard every game, but I am sure the lure of post-season glory, not to mention a healthy financial payoff, drives them to excel.

I don’t like, however, the format, a one-game playoff. I realize many things in life, in sports, in baseball are not “fair”. When the National League West faces the American League Central during inter-league play, a roll of this year’s dice might have the Dodgers hosting the Tigers and the Giants visiting the Royals. Is that equivalent? If you were fans of the Astros and Rangers, would you rather play the Cardinals or Reds this year? Is that fair? Well, no, but some things, such as which team is going to be good this year, and which won’t, and which clubs will turn out to be good and bad next year, when the schedules are made (already released for 2016) long before off-season trades and free agent signings, cannot be predicted. As I said, it is a roll of the dice. But I don’t like the one-game format. It forces teams to manipulate their rotations, put a price on which is more important, perhaps winning game 162 just to get into the Wild Card or hoping you do and saving your ace, giving that extra day rest to advance past round one. Of course, if you use him at that point, your ace will not be ready to go until game three of the next round, but that is a different matter. It is all strategy, which is why many people prefer the National League pitcher as hitter structure rather than the designated hitter.

But the real reason that I don’t like the one-game playoff has nothing to do with the ownership or management or even the players, the decision about resting your ace or shoving him out there on two days rest just to get into the wild card game. The reason I don’t like it, is simply because it provides a crappy no-reward, season-ending finale to the fans, particularly those who support the team that does not host this one-game death match.

As I sat down to watch the Cubs/Pirates game on television last month, I wondered which of these teams, would host that battle. It was quite a series, quite a preview of that one-game loser-go-home we will see tonight. My point is with the Cubs will playing the Pirates in Pittsburgh, with it being a one-game affair, Cubs fans, after supporting their team all year, and not having a post-season game in seven years, will have no opportunity to cheer for their team in Wrigley if they in fact lose to the higher-seeded team. If the Amazin’ Mets had not turned on all cylinders and pulled away in the NL East, and maybe, maybe gotten the second seed, their fans too would potentially have no opportunity to root at Citi Field. Does this seem right?

The reasons to keep the WC series a one-gamer include the length of the season, and the seasonal changes that can make for some pretty cold conditions. I understand that, as I go to a zillion games at AT&T which often, even or especially during the “summer”, feel like arctic conditions, bundling up with beanies and twelve layers of clothing. There is a way to deal with this. When Commissioner Manfred asks, I will tell him my plan. Next month, I’ll share my plan with you too.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “The Wild Card Format

  1. I agree that both wild card teams should have at least one home game. A three game series would be a better test of how good a team is, Any team can win a one game wild card, but it takes three good starters to sweep a three game wild card, or two good starters to win two out of three games.

    Like

    • I mistakenly mentioned it would take three good starters, when a team would only need two good starters, since it would be a two games out of three series.

      There could be a problem with logistics, if one of the wild card teams was from California and the other from Massachusetts. That would mean they would play one game, travel across the country to play the second game, and then make that long trip again, if the series was tied at one game each. There wouldn’t be time for travel days, because the World Series didn’t end till November 2nd this year as it is now.

      One solution would be to return to the 154 game schedule, to allow some extra days for travel.

      Like

  2. Eric I’m torn on the wild card. OF course our beloved Giants were the beneficiary of the present system using the strategy you laid out with our Super Starter/Reliever Madd Bum. But I truly do not want to see baseball in November. that’s football season, and the majority of the country doesn’t pay attention if their team is not in it. I’ve felt for years the season is toooo long. I’ve also felt that there could and should be a couple weekends a year, when double headers would be a great utensil to shorten the season. Perhaps on the Memorial Day, 4th of July, and maybe Labor Day holidays. The players union will flip out, but if it gave them some extra days off, maybe it would be worth a look.
    A three game series would be a very exciting and compelling. Something that may grab the attention of all baseball fans around the country.

    Like

  3. I also don’t like the idea of baseball being played in November. That leaves December and January as the only months in which major league baseball is not being played, since spring training starts in February.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s